Your reservation from the site shows your room preferences on your confirmation email, but contractually the hotel is only responsible for giving you any room they have. They simply buy a room at a negotiated price then charge you a premium. ![]() That's because many of the discount sites don't have direct access to hotel inventory. Although you may book a double queen non-smoking on the third party site, the site actually booked you a run of house room with the hotel. These normally require payment up front and a two week cancellation policy.Īlso, keep in mind that some third party websites use "run of house" reservations, meaning your room type is left to the hotel. The third party rates typically take advantage of Advance Purchase rates. Most hotels either have a 24 hour or 6pm day of arrival cancellation policy with a CC to hold the room if you book directly. Many times the reason you see a lower rate on a discount site is the cancellation policy. But the best workaround is to avoid practices like security cameras and stringent employees that make it so lawyers want to check out.One thing to keep in mind- while the room type might be "apples to apples", the terms of the reservation can differ greatly. Law firms argue that non-competes put them at a disadvantage to other businesses. And the complaint notes that lawyers and staff were monitored on security cameras.ĭo Lack of Non-Competes Put Lawyers At a Disadvantage? Among other things, Firm lawyers were subject to strict billable requirements, though they weren’t credited for hours spent on files where clients hadn’t paid- even if payment was later made. Not surprisingly, the bar complaint found that the Firm experienced high turnover rates…and no wonder. ![]() You might wonder why a firm would need such formidable non-competes. ethics rules which do not allow law firms to impose non-competes and forbid any practices that interfere with clients’ unfettered rights to counsel of their choosing. And in fact, the complaint alleges that the Firm had sued lawyers who took clients with them, even if the clients chose to follow. And the Firm also refused to notify clients of a lawyers’ departure, instead immediately reassigning the case to another Firm attorney. As a result, the Firm is currently the subject of a disciplinary proceeding for interfering with the “the rights of lawyers to practice after termination of their relationship with the firm” and employing policies that “prevented or impeded clients from choosing to continue to work with lawyers who were familiar with their cases.”Īmong other things, the Firm’s employment contract with attorneys required liquidated payments of as high as $50,000 if an attorney departed before the conclusion of the contract term, and barred departing lawyers from soliciting the Firm’s attorneys for employment for a period of 18 months and imposed a forced “referral fee” of one-third of revenues generated by departing lawyers who took firm clients with them. offices that went to all measures to keep attorneys tied to the Firm at least for the duration of their employment contracts. Turns out it is…at least based on a Reuters article about Tully Rinckey, a New York based military and employment law firm with D.C. Well, what if the Hotel California wasn’t an imaginary destination but a real, operating law firm. ![]() We’re all familiar with the song Hotel California, that fictitious resort where guests are trapped for eternity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |